Synthesis

Synthesis Essay on the Past, Present, and Future of Gun Control

 

Synthesis Essay on the Past, Present, and Future of Gun Control

Position Analysis

Gun control alludes to laws or arrangements that control the production, deal, exchange, ownership, alteration, or utilization of guns. The laws are varied in different countries around the globe (Celinska 233). Historically, the debate on gun control has faced many amendments in law, based on the disagreements among key government stakeholders. The two groups of gun control and rights to gun ownership are always in controversy on the stringent gun control issue. The gun control matter is very significant in the society since particular groups of humanity are gravely affected by civilian firearm ownership. About 16,272 homicides were submitted in the United States amid 2008. Of these, around 67 percent were submitted with firearms. 1993 across the country overview of 4,977 family units found that over the past five years, no less than 0.5% of families had individuals who had utilized a firearm for resistance amid a circumstance in which they thought somebody probably would have been executed in the event that they had not utilized a weapon for security. Applied to the U.S. populace, this adds up to 162,000 such occurrences for every year. This figure rejects all "military administration, police work, or fill in as a security guard. Based on study information from the U.S. Division of Justice, about 5,340,000 brutal violations were submitted in the United States amid 2008. These incorporate straightforward thefts, rapes, assaults, and murders. Of these, guilty parties unmistakably equipped with a gun submitted around 8 percent. Not only do Proponents for the pros to gun control exist but also the proponents for the cons of gun control, however, either party has weaknesses in their arguments. The future debate on gun ownership holds a controversial perspective on the matter.

Outline

The issue of gun control is so significant that it cannot be ignored. With late occasions bringing on disaster and pity, fierce acts and slaughters brought on by weapons have raised the issue of firearm control. The world health organization postulates that the cost and hence disease burden of the gunfire survivors are on the increase especially in developed countries (Kleck and Patterson 251). Children and women remain more vulnerable to gun shootings. Furthermore, people in crowded cities, busy shopping malls and students in schools and colleges are highly susceptible to gun shootings (Branas et al. 9).

The gun control matter attracts a couple of pros from the ardent proponents of the issue. The executioners in first world countries get seventy-five percent of the weapons utilized in criminal offenses legitimately. Promoters of gun control trust harder firearm laws could have possibly kept these wrongdoings. Gun control proposers, advocate for historical verifications to forestall hoodlums, household abusers, and truly rationally sick individuals from purchasing firearms, to reduce mass shootings. Nevertheless, arguments on pros of gun control have several faults. Proponents do not consider the critical role firearms play in facilitating security and crime reduction in the society.

Entities opposed to the gun control issue point out several cons of the matter, by highlighting the importance of civil firearms. The group focuses out that the privilege to remain battle ready for self-preservation is vital at all times (Vernick et al. 15). Critically, it is almost obvious that those who embrace the cons of gun control do not appreciate the hazards orchestrated by the latter tool, hence a major scuttle in their contention.

The future of gun control is both controversial and debatable. The proponents for both the pros and cons of firearm control do not agree, hence lack of a clear platform to critically approaching the problem. The matter is greatly politicized than rationally subjected to scrutiny and reason. Countries are diverse in terms of socio-political and cultural views about gun control, and hence varied future decisions on the matter.

Sources

Branas, Charles C. et al. “Investigating the Link between Gun Possession and Gun Assault.” American Journal of Public Health 2009: 2034–2040. Web

This article highlights the issue of gun control in America. Gun ownership by civilians is thought to cause a great risk to the general public. The firearm-related statistic in different USstates is articulated. Finally, the article gives a research-based relationship between gun possession and mass shootings.

Celinska, Katarzyna. “Individualism and Collectivism in America: The Case of Gun Ownership and Attitudes Toward Gun Control.” Sociological Perspectives 50.2 (2007): 229–247. Web

this article critically analyzes the issue of gun control in the US. Personal behavior, cultural views, and political alignments are thought to be core factors on gun legitimacy. Diverse opinions from both political and social divisions are outlined about gun control inclinations.

Kleck, Gary, and E. Britt Patterson. “The Impact of Gun Control and Gun Ownership Levels on Violence Rates.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9.3 (1993): 249–287. Web.

This article focuses on the impact of gun ownership on civilians. The pros of owning the gun are indicated, especially for self-defence in case of rape, or any other form of assault. The levels of violation of the rule of law, by criminals who utilize legitimately acquired guns to commit felons is discussed. Statistics on the prevalence of criminology is also highlighted.

Vernick, Jon S, et al. “Changing the Constitutional Landscape for Firearms: The US Supreme Court’s Recent Second Amendment Decisions.” American journal of public health 2011: 2021–6. Web.

This article argues about the cons for gun control. It brings out the need for recognizing the adverse effects caused by gun possession by the general public.It further highlights several amendments made in the US supreme courts pertaining gun control. The article also gives a correlation between gun control and the resultant effects on healthcare, due to nursing of gun injuries by survivors of the gun shooting.

Background Information

The sources were obtained from the internet by use of the internet search engine.